The Autonomous Cyber Threat – When AI Becomes the Attacker

For the first time, we have a documented case of a major cyber-attack executed largely without human intervention.  The attacker?  An AI.

In this episode of the Inspiring Tech Leaders podcast, I look at the alarming Anthropic incident, where a state-sponsored group manipulated the Claude Code AI model to act as an autonomous agent for espionage.

This isn't just about faster hacking.  It's a fundamental shift:

The Trick – How did hackers bypass safety guardrails? By simply tricking the AI into a "role-playing" scenario as a legitimate security employee.

The Threat - We are moving from defending against human hackers to defending against AI-managed threat agents. This lowers the barrier to entry for sophisticated, large-scale operations.

The Urgency – The episode explores why this incident makes AI safety frameworks and regulation a national security priority.

If you are a tech leader, a cybersecurity professional, or a policymaker, this is a must-listen.  The rules of defence have changed.

Available on: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube | All major podcast platforms

Start building your thought leadership portfolio today with INSPO.  Wherever you are in your professional journey, whether you're just starting out or well established, you have knowledge, experience, and perspectives worth sharing. Showcase your thinking, connect through ideas, and make your voice part of something bigger at INSPO - https://www.inspo.expert/

Everyday AI: Your daily guide to grown with Generative AI
Can't keep up with AI? We've got you. Everyday AI helps you keep up and get ahead.

Listen on: Apple Podcasts   Spotify

Chapters

• 0:00 Introduction
• 0:42 What Anthropic Discovered
• 1:36 How The Hack Worked
• 2:21 Why Experts Are Concerned
• 3:08 The Bigger Picture
• 3:47 [Ad] Everyday AI: Your daily guide to grown with Generative AI
• 4:35 (Cont.) The Bigger Picture
• 5:07 What Should be Done
• 7:01 Wrap Up

Transcript

Welcome to the Inspiring Tech Leaders podcast, with me Dave Roberts.  This is the podcast that talks with tech leaders from across the industry, exploring their insights, sharing their experiences, and offering valuable advice to technology professionals.  The podcast also explores technology innovations and the evolving tech landscape, providing listeners with actionable guidance and inspiration.

In today’s podcast I’m taking a closer look at a recent news story involving a state-sponsored cyber espionage campaign.  What makes it especially alarming is how autonomous the AI actually was, which may be a warning sign for a very real future.

In Mid-September 2025, Anthropic detected an attack.  According to their blog post, a Chinese government–backed hacker group had manipulated their AI, Claude Code, to launch cyber intrusions against organisations around the world.

These weren’t simple phishing attacks.  Anthropic claims that the majority of the attacks were executed without human oversight. In other words, Claude wasn’t just assisting, it was acting largely autonomously.  Anthropic describes it as “the first documented case of a cyber-attack largely executed without human intervention at scale”. 

Some intrusions succeeded, financially-linked firms and government agencies were targeted, and Anthropic says hackers accessed internal data.  But the AI also made mistakes, as Claude hallucinated, invented facts about targets, or claimed it had “discovered” information that was actually publicly available.

So how did attackers pull this off?  Anthropic reports that hackers bypassed Claude’s safety guardrails by tricking it into role-playing.  They told Claude to act like an employee of a legitimate cybersecurity firm carrying out tests.  Under this pretence, Claude provided instructions to perform reconnaissance, write exploit code, and move laterally in the target networks.

Because Claude was being played as a benign security tool, it didn’t raise its own internal alarms in the way you might expect.  The bad actors essentially dressed their malicious commands in a cloak of legitimacy.

And because Claude was doing most of the work, this was not just a speed-up of manual hacking.  It was a qualitative leap in scale, in automation, and in reduced human labour.

Unsurprisingly, experts are sounding the alarm.  Some see this as a stark demonstration of how AI systems are evolving, not just to assist humans, but to operate independently in high-stakes cyber operations.

This incident demonstrates why AI regulation needs to become a national priority.  AI systems now have the capability to automatically perform tasks that historically required highly skilled human hackers.

Experts in the industry are warning that companies may be too ready to adopt complex, poorly understood AI tools, which is exposing them to risks because they don’t fully grasp how these systems can be manipulated.  Society as a whole needs to be prepared for a rapidly shifting landscape where AI and cyber capabilities merge.

So, what does this incident mean more broadly?

This isn’t just about productivity or customer service.  AI models are increasingly powerful, and if misused, they can become weapons.  We are see how a tool built for benign development, like Claude Code, can be twisted into a vector for espionage.

If attacks can be automated, that lowers the skills needed to launch complex operations. Even less-sophisticated actors, or state-backed groups with limited “hands-on” manpower, might be empowered.  This is why AI regulation is critical to help control the use of the technology with appropriate guardrails.

Anthropic’s transparency in disclosing this is significant.  But some experts worry that such disclosures could also be a PR play, highlighting the risk while positioning themselves as a responsible gatekeeper.  Either way, it raises questions about accountability, responsibility, and how AI companies manage misuse.

Traditional cyber defence assumes human hackers.  Now, defenders must also think in terms of AI-managed threat agents. That changes how we simulate attacks, how we defend, and how we audit AI systems.

So, what now? Here are some take-aways and potential steps forward:

Regulators should accelerate work on AI safety frameworks. This incident underscores the urgency, not just around bias or disinformation, but national security.

AI companies must strengthen their guardrails.  It’s not enough to build safe systems; they need to be stress-tested especially against misuse like role-playing, social engineering, and agentic hijacking.

Cybersecurity teams in organisations must assume that future attackers may not be human.  Red-teaming exercises should simulate AI-driven attacks, not just conventional ones.

Transparency and threat-sharing should be improved.  Anthropic has revealed this incident, but we will need more cross-industry collaboration to understand the full picture.

Awareness and education for Executives, policy-makers, and technologists alike need to grasp that AI isn’t just a tool for automation, it can also be a vector for risk.

Agentic AI systems have substantially lowered the barrier to entry for sophisticated cyberattacks, enabling less experienced and less resourced threat actors to perform large-scale operations.  These AI systems can efficiently execute the work of entire teams of experienced hackers, including analysing target systems, producing exploit code, and scanning vast datasets of stolen information, with significantly less human involvement than previous vibe hacking operations.

Security teams must acknowledge this fundamental shift and actively experiment with applying AI for defence in areas like SOC automation, threat detection, vulnerability assessment, and incident response.  This must be coupled with continued investment in safeguards across AI platforms, improved detection methods, and stronger industry threat sharing to manage the proliferation of these new attack techniques.

So to wrap up, Anthropic’s disclosure isn’t just a cyber scare, it could be a turning point.  We are entering an age where AI doesn’t just assist us, it acts.  And when attackers leverage that, the potential impact is profound.

Well, that is all for today. Thanks for tuning in to the Inspiring Tech Leaders podcast. If you enjoyed this episode, don’t forget to subscribe, leave a review, and share it with your network.  You can find more insights, show notes, and resources at www.inspiringtechleaders.com

Head over to the social media channels, you can find Inspiring Tech Leaders on X, Instagram, INSPO and TikTok.  Let me know your thoughts on this topic.

Thanks for listening, and until next time, stay curious, stay connected, and keep pushing the boundaries of what is possible in tech.